Donald Trump may lose Trump Tower and personal penthouse in $454 million legal case

In a dramatic twist of events, former President Donald Trump finds himself at the center of a legal storm as he grapples with the possibility of forfeiting his iconic Trump Tower rather than coughing up a staggering $454 million bond in the ongoing civil fraud case against him.

The Trump World Tower at 845 United Nations Plaza in New York, US, on Thursday, Feb.  22, 2024. New York Attorney General Letitia James says she's ready to seize former President Trump's buildings and other assets if he can't pay the penalties imposed on him and his companies in the state's civil fraud case(Bloomberg)
The Trump World Tower at 845 United Nations Plaza in New York, US, on Thursday, Feb. 22, 2024. New York Attorney General Letitia James says she’s ready to seize former President Trump’s buildings and other assets if he can’t pay the penalties imposed on him and his companies in the state’s civil fraud case(Bloomberg)

New York state’s $454 million judgment against Donald Trump has been formally registered in Westchester County just outside Manhattan. This is a clear sign that his properties in the area may be at risk of being seized if he fails to post an appeal bond. Two of the real estate mogul’s most valuable properties – Trump National Golf Club Westchester and the mostly undeveloped 212-acre Seven Springs estate are facing seizure. James is prepared to seize Trump’s assets if he misses a March 25 deadline to post a bond for 120% of the judgment, to put it on

Read More

AI ‘hallucinated’ fake legal cases allegedly filed to BC court in Canadian first

A BC courtroom is believed to be the site of Canada’s first case of artificial intelligence inventing fake legal cases.

Lawyers Lorne and Fraser MacLean told Global News they discovered fake case law submitted by the opposing lawyer in a civil case in BC Supreme Court.

“The impact of the case is chilling for the legal community,” Lorne MacLean, KC, said.

“If we don’t fact check AI materials and they are inaccurate it can lead to an existential threat for the legal system: people waste money, courts waste resources and tax dollars, and there is a risk that the judgments will be erroneous, so it’s a huge deal.”


Click to play video: 'Examining AI in the courtroom'


Examining AI in the courtroom


Sources told Global News the case was a high-net-worth family matter, with the best interests of children at stake.

Story continues below advertisement

Lawyer Chong Ke allegedly used ChatGPT to prepare legal briefs in support of the father’s application to take his children to China for a visit — resulting in one or more cases that did not actually exist being submitted to the court.

Global News has learned Ke told the court she was unaware that AI chatbots like ChatGPT could be unreliable, and did

Read More

Highlights from Trump’s classified documents hearing after Judge Cannon denies a dismissal request

Before leaving after hearing arguments this morning, Trump looked around the room and with his lips pursed, eyed special counsel Jack Smith. He looked left to co-defendant Walt Nauta and gave a slight nod. He rarely looked around the room otherwise, instead looking at Judge Cannon, sometimes with his head cocked, such as when there was a discussion of Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified documents or John Brennan’s security clearance.

As he got up to leave, standing and beginning to walk toward a side exit, Trump leaned on the prosecutors’ table almost as if losing his step briefly.

During the hearing, Trump spoke intently with his defense attorney Todd Blanche at different moments. Sometimes he would lean forward toward the judge, his arms crossed. At other times, Trump pushed his back against the seat.

Jack Smith, seated on a bench behind prosecuting attorneys Jay Bratt and David Harbach, made very brief, frequent glances around the room in Trump’s direction and toward the judge. He looked up as Trump’s attorney Emil Bove argued that Clinton was not prosecuted for her handling of classified documents.

Before the start of the hearing, court staff brought in additional chairs for the defense table.

Read More

Supreme Court case raises questions of police powers, lawyer says

Supreme Court in Wellington, Coat of Arms

Supreme Court at Wellington.
Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King

The lawyer for a man appealing an aggravated robbery charge in the Supreme Court says his case raises deep questions about the limits of police powers, privacy, and fundamental human rights.

Mahia Tamiefuna was convicted of the charge in 2021, and central to the case was a photo that was taken of him illegally by a police officer.

Tamiefuna was the passenger in a car which was randomly stopped and his photo was taken while the occupants were standing on the side of the road as the vehicle was impounded.

The photo was then allowed to be used in court in the successful conviction.

That evidence was the “lynch pin” that the entire case against Tamiefuna was based on, his attorney Susan Gray said.

The Supreme Court is looking at whether the Court of Appeal was right to find the photo of Tamiefuna was “improperly obtained”, and whether that court was correct to allow it as evidence anyway.

But the case could have sweeping implications.

A decision could settle whether police are allowed to photograph members of the public on the street who are not being targeted for a specific crime.

Read More

Lawyer shares argument against second PSR charge

Matt Stanbury has shared how Everton could look to challenge the second charge handed out to them for breaching the Premier League’s spending rules.

The lawyer tweeted on Monday (19 March) that he would be arguing that the “objectively harsh” punishment the Blues were given for the first charge reinforces why they shouldn’t receive a further penalty for the second charge.

But he added that the Premier League should be looking to appeal against the four-point deduction handed out to Nottingham Forest as it appears to be “unduly lenient” both generally and based on the league’s own case.

“Logically the PL should appeal, as the sanction [given to Nottingham Forest] appears to be unduly lenient both generally and based on the Premier League’s own case,” said Stanbury.

“As to Everton, I’d be arguing that the objectively harsh punishment for charge one reinforces why it should be nothing more for charge two. Best they can do.”

Everton can’t afford further points deduction

This situation regarding points deductions has become very tedious for everyone and has largely put a dampener on the season.

It

Read More

Uber to pay Australian taxi operators $272 million in class action settlement

Uber has agreed to pay $271.8 million to Australian taxis and hire car drivers, operators and license holders to compensate them for losing income and license values ​​when the rideshare giant moves into the Australian market.

The class action against Uber was expected to go to trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria on Monday but Judge Lisa Nichols vacated it after the rideshare giant agreed to the colossal settlement.

It was the fifth-largest class action settlement in Australian history and one of the most successful class actions against Uber, the lawyers behind the case said.

Maurice Blackburn Lawyers principal Michael Donelly said the settlement was preceded by a five-year legal battle in which Uber “fought tooth and nail at every point along the way”.

An Uber sticker in the back window of a red car

Uber says ridesharing regulations did not exist when the company entered Australia.(ABC

Read More

Sam Smith & Normani Can’t Recover Legal Fees After Copyright Case Win

Six months after Sam Smith and Normani beat a copyright lawsuit over their 2019 hit “Dancing With a Stranger,” a federal judge is refusing to force their accuser to reimburse their legal fees — a bill the stars say exceeded $700,000.

Smith and Normani have argued that they shouldn’t be forced to foot the huge bill they incurred fending off the “frivolous and unreasonable” lawsuit, which claimed the duo had copied a little-known 2015 song of the same name when they created “Dancing .”

While US District Judge Wesley L. Hsu dismissed the lawsuit last year, he ruled Monday (Mar. 18) that the case was not so completely baseless as to warrant punishing the accuser with paying the stars’ massive legal bill.

“Plaintiff’s claims were neither frivolous nor objectively unreasonable,” the judge wrote, calling the lawsuit a “close and difficult case” on a “contentious area of ​​copyright law.”

Attorneys for Smith and Normani had argued that the lawsuit was merely a “gamble,” filed against the stars with “hopes for a massive payout.” But Judge Hsu said Monday there was “no evidence” of such ill intent by the accusers.

The case was filed in 2022 by songwriters Jordan Vincent, Christopher Miranda

Read More

Trump appeal bond claims are not valid, New York AG office says

Former US President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he arrives at a Manhattan courthouse trial in a civil fraud case brought by state Attorney General Letitia James against him, his adult sons, the Trump Organization and others in New York City, US, October 4 , 2023.

Mike Fresh | Reuters

Donald Trump should have pledged real estate he owns as collateral against a $464 million business fraud judgment if he were “truly unable” to get an appeal bond for that amount, the New York attorney general’s office said in a court filing Wednesday.

Trump “at a minimum” should have let the courts hold those properties while he appealed, a lawyer for Attorney General Letitia James wrote.

The attorney, Dennis Fan, argued that Trump had not provided any evidence this week to support his claim that it was “impossible” to obtain an appeal bond using his real estate holdings as collateral.

“Defendants supply no documentary evidence that demonstrates precisely what real property they offered” to potential insurers, wrote Fan, in the filing to Manhattan appeals court judges.

Nor did they report “on what terms that property was offered, or precisely why “bond insurers” were unwilling to accept the assets,”

Read More

Elvish Yadav’s lawyer reveals how the Bigg Boss OTT 2 winner got bail in Snake Venom Case, his friend also out of jail

Elvish Yadav has received bail in the Snake Venom case. Reports suggest that the Bigg Boss OTT 2 winner is already out of jail. His lawyer has now given a media statement in which he revealed how Elvish got bail in the case where bail appeared tough. The decision came a day after the NDPS act was removed from the charges levied against him. Not just Elvish, his friend Vinay, who was also arrested recently, is out on bail.

During his official statement, Elvish’s lawyer Prashant Rathi said, “The honorable court has passed the order. Elvish is granted bail at the assurance of Rs. 50,000 per two people. The proceedings are taking place and as soon as they happen, Elvish will be out of jail.”

Prashant then went on to talk about what argument he presented in court that led to Elvish’s bail. “Our argument was that there wasn’t substantial evidence against Elvish. His name was dragged in the case falsely. The main accused is also out on bail,” he shared.

Elvish’s friend is also out

Prashant further clarified that Elvish’s two friends, who were arrested after him, were also out on bail. They also had to pay a fine

Read More

“I have concerns”: Gov. Walz weighs in on Hennepin County attorney’s case against state trooper

Mary Moriarty and Tim Walz

Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty and Gov. Tim Walz. Photos: Kyle Stokes/Axios and Angelina Katsanis/Star Tribune via Getty Images

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz says he has concerns about the Hennepin County Attorney’s handling of the murder case against a state trooper who fatally shot a man during a 2023 traffic stop.

The big picture: A legal dispute between county attorney Mary Moriarty and trooper Ryan Londregan’s defense over a use-of-force expert sparked criticism from law enforcement and calls from Republicans for her to resign.

  • On Friday, the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association sent the governor a letter asking him to use his legal authority to direct the attorney general’s office to take over the prosecution.

Catch up fast: Moriarty announced in January that his office was charging Londregan with second-degree unintentional murder for shooting and killing Ricky Cobb II last July.

  • It marked Moriarty’s first prosecution of a high-profile shooting by law enforcement since winning election in 2022 on a platform that included holding police accountable for misconduct.

The latest: Critics of the case concerns raised after Londregan’s defense attorney claimed in a court filing last week that Moriarty’s charges went against his own use-of-force expert’s opinion that the

Read More