Bill C-21: Liberal gun control bill becomes law

The federal Liberal government’s contentious gun control legislation Bill C-21 passed the Senate without changes on Thursday, becoming law on Friday.

The bill passed the House of Commons in May after months of division and political acrimony. The version that made it to the Senate was significantly expanded from what the federal government had initially tabled a year ago.

Bill C-21 passed by a vote of 60 to 24and with applause in the upper chamber.

The legislation includes measures to:

  • Tighten gun laws to include “red flag” and “yellow flag” provisions relating to a gun owner posing a risk to themselves or others;
  • Impose a “freeze” on the sale, purchase or transfer of handguns in Canada;
  • A prospective Criminal Code “technical definition” of what constitutes a prohibited assault-style firearm, meant to “cement in law” a permanent ban on future models once the bill comes into force;
  • A series of provisions meant to make it illegal to make or buy ghost guns and to combat firearms smuggling; and
  • Wording makes clear the government’s intent to uphold Indigenous treaty rights.

The bill also includes a requirement for a parliamentary review of the technical definition five

Read More

Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Khosla Ventures Acquisition Co. II Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit Pending: Contact The Gross Law Firm Before April 29, 2024 to Discuss Your Rights

NEW YORK, March 22, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Khosla Ventures Acquisition Co. II.

Shareholders who purchased shares of KIND during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointment. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to take part in any recovery.

CONTACT US HERE:

https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/nextdoor-holdings-inc-fka-khosla-ventures-acquisition-co-ii-loss-submission-form/?id=72097&from=4

CLASS PERIOD: July 6, 2021 to November 8, 2022

ALLEGATIONS: The complaint alleges that during the class period, Defendants issued materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) Nextdoor’s financial results prior to the November 2021 merger with Khosla Ventures Acquisition Co. II, had been temporarily inflated by the ephemeral effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which had pulled forward demand for Nextdoor’s platform and cannibalized future advertising revenue growth; (b) rather than being sustained, such growth trends had already begun reversing at the start of the class period; (c) Nextdoor’s total addressable market was materially smaller than the 312 million households represented to investors; (d) by the start of the class period, Nextdoor’s most important market – the US market – was already substantially saturated, impairing the Company’s ability to

Read More

Appeals court seems skeptical of Texas’ argument for immigration law

Judges on the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals appeared unreceptive to argue by Texas’ solicitor general Wednesday that the state’s new immigration law should take effect because it “mirrors” federal law.

A three-judge panel of the court had ruled 2-1 late Tuesday that the measure, known as Senate Bill 4, should be temporarily blocked while the judges hear the case. Earlier Tuesday, the US Supreme Court said it could take effect.

“Texas has a right to defend itself,” state Solicitor General Aaron Nielson said, adding that the district court had acknowledged that “sometimes those associated with the cartels cross over the border with malicious intent.”

Migrants cross into the United States from Mexico in El Paso, Texas, on May 8.
Migrants cross into the United States from Mexico in El Paso, Texas, on May 8.John Moore/Getty Images files

The law, which Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, signed in December, would allow police officers to arrest migrants and impose criminal penalties. It would also empower state judges to order the deportation of people to Mexico.

Chief Judge Priscilla Richman, a George W. Bush appointee, noted that states don’t have police power to remove people from the US

“This is the first time, it seems to me, that a state has claimed that they

Read More

Supreme Court case raises questions of police powers, lawyer says

Supreme Court in Wellington, Coat of Arms

Supreme Court at Wellington.
Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King

The lawyer for a man appealing an aggravated robbery charge in the Supreme Court says his case raises deep questions about the limits of police powers, privacy, and fundamental human rights.

Mahia Tamiefuna was convicted of the charge in 2021, and central to the case was a photo that was taken of him illegally by a police officer.

Tamiefuna was the passenger in a car which was randomly stopped and his photo was taken while the occupants were standing on the side of the road as the vehicle was impounded.

The photo was then allowed to be used in court in the successful conviction.

That evidence was the “lynch pin” that the entire case against Tamiefuna was based on, his attorney Susan Gray said.

The Supreme Court is looking at whether the Court of Appeal was right to find the photo of Tamiefuna was “improperly obtained”, and whether that court was correct to allow it as evidence anyway.

But the case could have sweeping implications.

A decision could settle whether police are allowed to photograph members of the public on the street who are not being targeted for a specific crime.

Read More

Juvenile cases are big business for a handful of lawyers in Cuyahoga County

This article was published in partnership with The Marshall Project, a nonprofit news organization covering the U.S. criminal justice system. Sign up for their Cleveland newsletter and follow them on Instagram, TikTok, Reddit and Facebook.

The juvenile court system is supposed to ensure that young people accused of crimes have legal representation, even if their families can’t afford a lawyer.

But in Cuyahoga County, some courtrooms resemble hiring halls for favored attorneys who get hundreds of assignments yearly, while others get none.

According to the most recent year of invoices submitted between October 2022 through September 2023, the juvenile court paid at least 60 attorneys to represent hundreds of children accused of crimes. Of those, judges steered more than two-thirds of the work to just 10 of the lawyers, according to a Marshall Project – Cleveland analysis of the most recent case data and state reimbursement filings.

Traffic lights are on in front of the Cuyahoga County Juvenile Justice Center at dusk.

Sylvia Jarrus for The Marshall Project

In one year, the court paid at least 60 attorneys to represent children accused of crimes. Of those, judges at the Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court steered more than two-thirds of the work to just 10 of the lawyers.

Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court’s system

Read More

O’Neill Burke, Harris too close to call – NBC Chicago

Many races in Tuesday’s election have been called, although some races and referendums remain outstanding. You can see live election results from the Illinois Primary here.

One day after the Illinois primary election, the race for who will be the Democratic Party’s nominee for Cook County State’s Attorney remains too close to call.

As of 5 am Wednesday, Eileen O’Neill Burke had a narrow lead over Clayton Harris. With 99% of precincts reporting, they’re separated by roughly 9,000 votes.

The Chicago Board of Elections noted that mail-in ballots are continuing to be processed.

“Per Illinois election code, all late-arriving but properly postmarked (by March 19th) vote-by-mail ballots have a two-week period to be counted – and that would bring us to April 2nd,” CBOE director of public information Max Bever said.

Bever noted however that the vast majority of vote-by-mail ballots came back on election day or night, and the immediately Wednesday and Thursday following.

“By the time those are processed and included into the unofficial results, we may have a much clearer picture by this weekend,” Bever said, of the race.

Earlier in the day, Bever noted that Chicago’s voter turnout was “shockingly low,” saying that only 20% of

Read More

Trump’s media merger is unlikely to stop Letitia James from targeting his assets on Monday

Former President Trump stands to gain billions in stock shares in a merger announced Friday of his social media company and a shell company. But that deal may not keep New York Attorney General Letitia James from moving to seize his assets on Monday in order to satisfy the $464 million bond stemming from the judgment in his financial fraud trial. Here are the latest legal developments involving the presumptive Republican presidential nominee for 2024.

New York financial fraud

Media merger will give Trump cash windfall, but won’t shield his assets from Monday’s bond deadline

Key players: New York Attorney General Letitia James, Judge Arthur Engoron, Trump Media & Technology Group, Digital World Acquisition Corp.

  • On Friday, Trump’s social media company completed a merger with a shell company that could give the former president a cash infusion at a time when he is struggling to pay legal bills and meet more than half a billion dollars in bond obligations, CNN reported.

  • But the deal, which is estimated to be worth more than $3 billion for Trump on paper, won’t prevent James from moving on Monday to seize his assets to try to satisfy the $464 billion bond owed

Read More

In-House Lawyers Contract Law update: April 2023

If there’s an overarching theme one can derive from these cases, it’s the importance (again!) of spelling out in clear and unambiguous language the key elements of the commercial deal.  Vague concepts like “good faith” are unlikely to get you very far, and it is extremely hard to imply key commercial terms when the express contract is silent on an issue. 

While all of this reiterates the need for precise and clear-headed drafting, it does not mean we should weigh our contracts down with long and convoluted provisions spelling out each and every possibility and drafting accordingly. Pragmatism and commerciality remain evident too.  In this, we are comforted by Lord Leggatt’s wise words in Barton v Morris: “life is too short to negotiate contract terms designed to cover every contingency that may occur”.  Quite…

Barton v Morris: when staying silent costs millions

Background

On 25 January 2023, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Barton & Others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn Jones (deceased).

While the majority decision is broadly in line with the prevailing approach taken by the courts to date in respect of contractual interpretation, ie they will be reluctant to interfere

Read More

What to expect from Trump’s trials and court cases in 2024

The past year saw Donald Trump on trial twice, predicted four times and hit with a multimillion-dollar civil verdict while also fighting off other legal challenges and running for president; his 2024 court calendar could be even more chaotic.

The former president faces up to five separate trials in the new year and verdicts in two civil cases that could cost him and his business hundreds of millions of dollars. In the four criminal cases, he faces 91 felony counts, including some on charges that carry maximum prison terms of 20 years.

Only one of the impending trial dates appears to be set in stone: that of the civil damages trial in a defamation case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll, which is scheduled to start Jan. 16. That’s one day after the Iowa caucuses, in which Trump is leading in the polls and has predicted an “epic landslide” victory.

The trial dates for the four pending criminal cases are all in flux thanks to Trump appeals and efforts to delay them until after the election, but it’s possible he could stand trial as early as March in either the federal election interference case in Washington, DC, or the Manhattan

Read More

Doctors Hesitate to Ask About Patients’ Immigration Status Despite New Florida Law

Fearful of risking their jobs, jeopardizing state funding for their institutions, and further politicizing health care, Florida hospital leaders have been reluctant to speak out against a new law that requires them to ask about patients’ immigration status.

While Florida joins Kansas, Texas, Mississippi, and a handful of other states in proposing crackdowns on immigrants lacking legal residency, no other state has mandated that hospitals question patients about their citizenship.

Doctors, nurses, and health policy experts say the law targets marginalized people who already have difficulty navigating the health care system and will further deter them from seeking medical help.

Olveen Carrasquillo, a practicing physician and professor at the University of Miami’s Miller School of Medicine, said he’s dismayed that more health care professionals aren’t speaking out against the harm the law may cause.

“Imagine if all the hospitals said, ‘This is wrong. We can’t do it.’ But they just stay silent because they may lose state funding,” Carrasquillo said. “We do have political leaders who are very vindictive and who come after you.”

Touted by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis as “the most ambitious anti-illegal immigration” legislation in the country, Florida’s law was enacted in July and requires, among other

Read More