Hong Kong passes controversial security law which grants government more power to quash dissent | WorldNews

Hong Kong’s parliament has unanimously passed a new security law which grants the government more power to quash dissent.

The new legislation threatens sentences of up to life in prison for offenses including treason and insurrection, as well as stringent penalties for other offenses such as sabotage, external interference and theft of state secrets.

Hong Kong’s Legislative Council, which is packed with Beijing loyalists, says the new law aims to protect national security.

However, the move is widely seen as the latest step in a sweeping political crackdown following large-scale 2019 street protests that challenged China’s rule over the semi-autonomous territory.

Critics fear the new legislation – an expansion on the controversial imposition of the 2019 Beijing’s National Security Law – will further eradicate civil liberties that Xi Jinping’s government promised to preserve for 50 years when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997.

Amnesty International described the passing of the new legislation – named Article 23 – as a “crushing blow to human rights in the city”.

“The passing of Article 23 sends the clearest message yet that the Hong Kong authorities’ hunger to accommodate Beijing’s will strips any past commitments on human rights,” the group

Read More

Move to expand CT’s sick day law gets committee approval

Connecticut lawmakers have advanced legislation seeking to expand the state’s paid sick day law to include all employees in the state.

The move would require workplaces to offer employees 40 hours of paid sick time per year. Current law only mandates this for workplaces with 50 or more employees.

Sick days can be used for time needed to tend to illness, injury and mental health. The time can also be used toward recovery from family violence or sexual assault. Improving the statute is an issue of gender and racial equity, said Janée Woods Weber, executive director of She Leads Justice, a nonprofit that advocates for women in Connecticut.

“Workers who lack access to paid sick days, also tend to work jobs that don’t pay livable wages, or have predictable schedules,” Woods Weber said. “So not being forced to choose between their paychecks and taking off a day or two to recover from an illness also helps to protect their economic security.”

Connecticut’s largest business organization, CBIA, said the high number of open jobs is already making private companies seriously examine employee pay and benefits.

“Companies that can’t offer paid time off are at a significant disadvantage,” Ashley Zane, senior public

Read More

Quebec law protecting seniors from eviction may soon be extended: QS

The Legault government is looking to table Quebec Solidaire’s (QS) Bill 198, which expands the scope of the Françoise David law to better protect seniors from eviction, in the near future.

QS parliamentary leader Alexandre Leduc made the announcement on Friday. In an interview with The Canadian Press, he welcomed the outcome, which came after months of pressure.

“It’s good news,” he said. “In the current context of evictions and renovations, it’s not too much to ask.”

The law commonly, known as “Françoise David’s law” after the former QS leader, passed in 2016. It stipulates that a senior over 70 with a very low income who has lived in his or her home for more than 10 years cannot be evicted.

Last year, however, QS MNA Christine Labrie said more needed to be done to protect a greater number of senior tenants “from the savage evictions that are multiplying.”

She introduced Bill 198, “An Act to amend the Civil Code in order to ensure greater protection for senior tenants against repossession or eviction.”

The aim was to broaden the criteria to include people 65 and over who have been living in their home for at least five years.

More recently,

Read More

How Much Is My Florida Car Accident Case Worth?

If you’ve been injured in a car accident in Florida, one of the first questions that may come to mind is: “How much is my car accident case worth?” It’s a fair question—but the truth is, every case is different. The value of your case depends on a combination of factors, from the severity of your injuries to the impact on your daily life and how strong the evidence is.

While there’s no set formula, understanding what goes into calculating a settlement can help you get a clearer picture of what to expect—and why having an experienced attorney matters.

Key Takeaways

  • Your case’s value depends on medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and long-term effects
  • Florida’s no-fault laws limit recovery unless injuries meet a certain threshold
  • Insurance companies often offer low settlements without a lawyer involved
  • Evidence like medical records, accident reports, and witness statements are critical
  • You have 2 years to file a personal injury claim in Florida

Factors That Affect the Value of a Florida Car Accident Case

Here are some of the biggest factors that influence what your case may be worth:

1. Medical Expenses

This includes past and future medical bills, rehabilitation, physical therapy, surgeries, …

Read More

Media Freedom Act: a new bill to protect EU journalist and press freedom | News

Under the new law, adopted by 464 votes in favor to 92 against and 65 abstentions, member states will be obliged to protect media independence and all forms of intervention in editorial decisions will be prohibited.

Protecting journalists’ work

Authorities will be prohibited from pressing journalists and editors to disclose their sources, including by detaining them, sanctions, office searches, or by installing intrusive surveillance software on their electronic devices.

Parliament added sizeable safeguards to allow the use of spyware, which will be possible only on a case-by-case basis and subject to authorization by a judicial authority investigating serious crimes punishable by a custodial sentence. Even in these cases, subjects will have the right to be informed after the surveillance has occurred and will be able to challenge it in court.

Editorial independence of public media

To prevent public media outlets from being used for political purposes, their heads and board members should be selected through transparent and non-discriminatory procedures for quite long terms of office. It will not be possible to dismiss them before their contract ends, unless they no longer meet the professional criteria.

Public media will have to be financed using transparent and objective procedures, and the funding

Read More

Texas board proposes rules on abortion law emergency exemption

Qhe Texas Medical Board, responding to pressure from the state Supreme Court and widespread uncertainty among physicians, proposed draft guidance Friday in an attempt to clarify what constitutes emergency grounds for a legal abortion.

A summary of the proposed rules were read out by board president Sherif Zaafran, who summarized the proposed rules at a regularly scheduled meeting. He said they were not intended to “regulate or prohibit abortion” but to help define legal exemptions where abortion is permitted to save the life or major bodily function of the mother.

“The law leaves it to physicians, not judges, both the discretion and the responsibility to exercise their reasonable medical judgment,” he said. The proposed language is now subject to at least 30 days review and public comment before it will be voted on by the board.

The board’s language largely drew from existing state legislation, and defined an emergency as “a life threatening condition aggravated by, caused by or arising from a pregnancy that, as certified by a physician, places the woman in danger of death or a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function unless an abortion is performed.”

In cases where physicians deem an

Read More

Trump trials’ comedy of errors – is it legal inexperience to blame? | US news

You’re reading Guardian US’s free Trump on Trial newsletter. To get the latest court developments delivered to your inbox, sign up here.

Programming notes: starting next week, Trump on Trial will be sent weekly on Wednesdays.

On the docket: rookie mistakes

It’s been a chaotic week in Trump’s criminal trials – and a lot of the mayhem has been caused by self-help and missteps by the legal figures involved in his various cases.

When Judge Aileen Cannona federal judge with only three years of experience on the bench, issued her latest order in the criminal classified documents case on Monday, legal observers were dumbfounded.

The national security attorney Bradley Moss posted on X that her instructions were “legally insane”. Attorney George Conway, a leading #NeverTrump conservative, responded by calling it “utterly nuts”. The former US attorney Joyce Vance called it “two pages of crazy” and wrote that she had to read the order several times to try to figure out what it meant.

“Not only should Aileen Cannon not be sitting on this case, but she should not be sitting on the federal bench at all,” Conway posted.

Cannon’s Monday order told Trump’s attorneys and the justice

Read More

Little-known law needs Justice Department attention

You might not have heard of the Death in Custody Reporting Act (DCRA), which was enacted a decade ago, but it requires the Justice Department to collect and manage reports on people who die while in government custody. The Federal Drive with Tom Temin spoke with David Janovsky, a senior policy analyst at the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), who said the DoJ has a long history of not quite living up to the law.

Tom Temin And this law then, has been around again a while. What specifically is Justice supposed to do here?

David Janovsky So there are three main components to the Death and Custody Reporting Act. First, Justice is supposed to be collecting data on deaths in custody from local, state and federal law enforcement and corrections agencies. And it’s important to note that the definition of in custody is broader than people might initially assume. It covers any circumstances from the moment someone is interacting with law enforcement and is not free to leave. So it could be a traffic stop, not even necessarily an arrest all the way through incarceration in a prison, jail or immigration detention.

Tom Temin So it’s incumbent then on

Read More

Why is the Biden administration going after Big Tech?

The Biden administration escalated its legal assault on Big Tech this week with a case against the world’s second-largest company, Apple, over alleged abuse of its iPhone monopoly.

The lawsuit comes months after federal agencies filed a lawsuit against Amazon and prosecuted a trial against Google — both of which targeted the respective companies’ market dominance.

An ongoing case against Meta, henceforth, aims to unwind its ownership of Instagram and Whatsapp.

The campaign in the courts reflects a growing bipartisan consensus concerned about the power of sprawling tech companies whose products and services pervade the lives of everyday Americans, experts told ABC News.

But, they added, the push also indicates a concrete effort to protect consumers and enhance private sector competition, as well as updated anti-monopoly enforcement to address 21st century problems.

“These cases are quite a big deal,” Bill Baer, ​​a fellow with the Brookings Institution and former head of antitrust at the Department of Justice under President Barack Obama, told ABC News. “These tech platforms have amassed enormous power.”

Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did Google nor Meta.

In a statement to ABC News, Apple strongly rebuked the case brought by the

Read More

Often discussed on social media, what is the “Law of Attraction”? Page all

KOMPAS.com – A number of netizens have talked about it several times law of attraction on social media.

Law of attraction often associated with a person’s failure or success in getting the things they want in life.

Often, law of attraction It is also associated with the belief that thoughts are a form of energy where the law of attraction applies.

So, what is it? law of attraction what netizens often talk about on social media?

Also read: Viral, video of a room full of trash is called mental hoarding disorder, is it true?

Quoted from Verry Well Mindlaw of attraction or law of attraction is a philosophy that states that positive thoughts will bring positive results to a person’s life.

This applies the opposite, namely negative thoughts will bring negative results to a person’s life.

Ways of working law of attraction depending on the energy of the mind that will help someone ‘attract’ something they want.

The principle of the law of attraction

It is stated that there are main universal principles that form the law of attraction, namely:

1. Likes attract likes

This law shows that like things attract each other.

This principle also believes that the

Read More